implemented
ConceptReview 1.0.0
Schema: https://www.alivehealthtech.com/schemas/concept-review/1.0.0.json.
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
dimensions[] |
13 rubric dimensions (D01–D13), each with assessment, evidence_gaps, questions, next_experiments, claims, and label (ai_hypothesis unless a named person confirms it). |
claims[].citations[] |
source_key, verdict (supported, partially_supported, not_supported, contradicted, not_verifiable), quote (only when the licence allows), quote_sha256, judges_agreed. |
claims[].supported |
true only with an anchored quote, a second judge agreeing, ok or corrected integrity, and a peer-reviewed source. |
sources[] |
Registry metadata (never the AI's), integrity, review_status, text_basis, licence. |
excluded_sources[] |
Retracted records and why they were excluded. |
limitations, notices |
What the review cannot tell you; required attributions. |
business_assessment |
The same intake-derived business question map as the plan. It is separate from the literature review and makes no verified commercial claim. |
A concept review never contains verified_failure or modeled_outcome: nothing was executed.
The app can download the full ConceptReview, including its business map and citation records, as
JSON. The map uses the confirmed intake, not external buyer research; a user_claim is not a
verified market fact.