Skip to content
Documentation navigation +
implemented

ConceptReview 1.0.0

Schema: https://www.alivehealthtech.com/schemas/concept-review/1.0.0.json.

Field Meaning
dimensions[] 13 rubric dimensions (D01–D13), each with assessment, evidence_gaps, questions, next_experiments, claims, and label (ai_hypothesis unless a named person confirms it).
claims[].citations[] source_key, verdict (supported, partially_supported, not_supported, contradicted, not_verifiable), quote (only when the licence allows), quote_sha256, judges_agreed.
claims[].supported true only with an anchored quote, a second judge agreeing, ok or corrected integrity, and a peer-reviewed source.
sources[] Registry metadata (never the AI's), integrity, review_status, text_basis, licence.
excluded_sources[] Retracted records and why they were excluded.
limitations, notices What the review cannot tell you; required attributions.
business_assessment The same intake-derived business question map as the plan. It is separate from the literature review and makes no verified commercial claim.

A concept review never contains verified_failure or modeled_outcome: nothing was executed. The app can download the full ConceptReview, including its business map and citation records, as JSON. The map uses the confirmed intake, not external buyer research; a user_claim is not a verified market fact.